Open Access
Numéro d'article 01011
Nombre de pages 1
Section Conférences
Publié en ligne 9 mars 2020
  1. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Computer technology applications in surgi cal implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:92-109. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mora MA, Chenin DL, Arce RM. Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant- guided surgery. Dent Clin North Am 2014;58(3):597-626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Solaberrieta E, Minguez R, Barrenetxea L, Otegi JR, Szentpétery A. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113(3):191-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koralakunte PR, Aljanakh M. The role of virtual articulator in prosthetic and restorative dentistry. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(7):ZE25-8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Deeb GR, Soliman O, Alsaad F, Jones P, Deluke D, Laskin DM. Simultaneous virtual planning implant surgical guides and immediate laboratory fabricated provisionals: An impressionless technique. J Oral Implantol 2016;42(4):363-9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arunyanak SP, Harris BT, Grant GT, Morton D, Lin WS. Digital approach to planning computer-guided surgery and immediate provisionalization in a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(1):8-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Naert I, etal: Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: An RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:1315, 2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deeb GR, Allen RK, Hall VP, Whitley D, Laskin DM, Bencharit S. How accurate are implant surgical guides produced with desktop stereolithographic 3-dimantional printers ? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Whitley D, Eidson RS, Rudek I, Bencharit S. In-office fabrication of dental implant surgical guides using desktop stereolithographic printing and implant treatment planning software: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118(3):256-263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems—a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18(2):101-29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014 Jan 30;14:10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Patzelt S, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145(6):542-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 2015;24(4):313-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Joda T, Bragger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25(11):1304-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallardo YN, Teixeira IR, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Newton S, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 28, 2017 602-612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cassetta M, Bellardini M. How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46:922-930. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]